Monday, January 1, 2018

Rationality is Scientific and a Little Philosophical

Let us take the statement the grass is greener on the other side. If the grass is “greener” on the other side, what would a rational human do, he would try to get to the other side. The rational human being in such a situation would obviously want some of that “green” grass. This is a philosophical answer, a rational human is expected to try and get to the “greener” grass, what has science to do with this, rationality is a philosophical concept.

The paper “Knowledge Economics: Summary and Rationality”, it was argued that the algorithm of information explains everything that exists and that essentially everything comes down to probability. But to see that the grass is greener on the other side and that it is rational to get to the other side where the grass is “greener”, what has this to do with probability, it is a philosophical question, next thing there will be claims that the algorithm of information can explain even death, how can death be a probability when everybody knows death is certain, we will die.

One can argue that when one decides to go to the grass that is greener, but how do they understand that the grass is greener on the other side, they can sense it with their eyes, or some other senses, that is not important here, what is important is they sense that the grass is greener on the other side. One has decided that they will cross to the other side, a decision has been made. Here we see the interplay of big concept of rationality and small concepts that work within. It is a rational decision to get to the other side to survive because one can see that the probability of surviving is greater on the other side. But, are the actions taken to get to the other side rational.

If one gets to the other side, they took rational steps to get to the other side. If one does not get to the other side they took irrational steps to get to the other side, they made irrational choices in chasing a rational outcome. A choice is only irrational if it does not lead to a desired outcome. Thus, for a slave it is rational to desire freedom, the choices they make will determine if their actions are rational, if they become free actions are rational, if they do not become free actions are irrational.

One is in their position in life by chance. Planning increases one’s chances of being where they are, but it remains chance. To become some successful businessmen is called risky for a reason, but to take that risk one must make the decision of becoming a business person. The reason why it is greener on the other side is also by chance, it could be your side that is greener except by chance, even if it seems certain, no, the San in Africa are hunters and gatherers in this day only by chance, it does not matter if they have been doing it for the last 10 000 years. Any time in the last 10 000 years they could have made decisions that would have led to a different path.

There is nothing outside the algorithm of information, not even death. Death is not certain because birth is not certain, you can not die if you are not born, and your birth is itself a massive probability, what if your parents never met, what if your grandfather was killed, what if your greatest grandfather going 300 generations back got a disease and died as a kid. Life is extremely rare in our solar system, though we are made up as everything else in the universe, the electrons, protons, and electrons that make up life are extremely rare, the probability that the electrons, protons, and neutrons that make you up ended on the earth are extremely rare, but it has occurred you start believing it was certain.

So rationality itself can be put on a scale, the irrationality of purchasing a rotten apple and a life and death decision must receive different scaling.

Life is rare and should be enjoyed, that is why we push for liberty. Everybody wants a long good life, life as a slave is no good, it is rational to reject it and fight. True one can argue there is death everywhere, stars die, but life as we know it is rare, it last 100 years on a good run, stars exist for billions of years, an electron could last a trillion years, but that same electron representing breathing life, 100 years, as determined by the algorithm of information, iff, and that is a big iff, a life of such a nature occurs, it will be good if it lasts 100 years, for a long time in human history being 35 years old one was an elder, but they still had the potential to enjoy 100 years.

Simple as it is, nothing can exist outside the laws determined by the algorithm of information, we add philosophy to try and understand the results of this algorithm.

Bhekuzulu Khumalo

Tuesday, August 22, 2017

Explaining the Thomas Young Experiment

I am reluctantly posting this paper on this blog in order that people understand where the idea for the paper, "The Photon and Endless Energy" comes from. And even this paper has its roots in scrap thoughts I had trying to reconcile wave theory and information, never forgetting all information is discrete.

This paper needs more working on, however the process of ziyenza can be written about. Another fact that will stand the test of time from this paper will be the explanations for figures 9, 9.1, and 9.2, we know where the particle is going if we understand its charecteristics, the information that makes it up, yes. we can know where each and every particle will end up in the double slit experiment.

Why do we need the sun, only for photons, once we control and capture photons, we do not need the sun.

Explaining the Thomas Young Experiment

Abstract:         Looking at a photon and accepting experiments that have taken place we can understand what happens in the Thomas Young experiment when we try to observe which slit the particle goes through and have an answer for the wave particle duality. Understanding this allows us in practical terms to remove the idea of the power of the human’s mind to control a particle as we accept the only interactions that can be taking place. The major implications of understanding what is happening when we observe the particle deciding which slit to take is we understand the very roots of optics as well as the potential of enormous amounts of energy for humanity. At the end of the discussion lingering questions will remain, where does the photon get its energy from? And secondly if the arguments presented in this paper are proven wrong, then how do we fundamentally see if a photon can not self radiate. As with most papers in dealing with the very small, with light, with quantum mechanics experiments are presented.

Keywords:      captured photons, double slit experiment, energy, information, photon, single photon, ziyenza

Introduction:  Thomas Young first performed what could be dubbed as the most popular and most puzzling experiment in physics back in 1801. Today the experiment is commonly known as the double slit experiment. Hence forth the Thomas Young experiment will be called the double slit experiment, though it would be more academically correct to call it the Thomas Young experiment, acknowledging the origins of the idea.

Though the world tries to portray the findings of quantum mechanics as bizarre, they can only do this because most theories in quantum mechanics are easily testable in principle, what is required most often is the instrumentation. As knowledge increases one discrete piece at a time, one knowl at a time, technology reciprocates, increasing one discrete unit at a time and the instrumentation eventually catches up to the theory and an experiment must take place to verify the theory, with experimentation we either accept or reject the hypothesis. Procedures are firmly placed on how to experiment, but not only how we experiment, how we extrapolate knowledge from the experimentation process, create new theories and eventually when instrumentation catches up experimentation takes place and the theory is either verified or rejected.

After the experimentation process takes place, one can either accept the results or dispute them for example, one can either choose to accept to accept Alain Aspects entanglement experiments and the implications, or one can choose not to support the results of Alain Aspect’s experiments for their own reasons, for their own character make up, the driving forces of their life’s, is entanglement incomparable to light, because of the different physical properties of the phenomenon’s? Accepting experiments is about how one accepts reality, though vaccines in general have proved to be effective, there are still millions who don’t accept the benefits of vaccination.

Entanglement is seemingly one bizarre aspect of quantum mechanics even though it is proven regularly, it is a phenomenon that is part of reality and as scientists to answer many questions we need to look at the isolated phenomenon in relation to the environment, all relationships result in a loss of freedom, this loss of freedom is what experiments try to understand, what is the result of this loss of freedom, what is result of things bumping into each other, do they bounce of, is one absorbed, do they absorb each other, experiments are about seeing relationships in one way or another. Theories set out possibilities in these relationships that are yet known or proven but are based on sound scientific and analytical background.

Light:  Light has some bizarre questions that need to be asked, when we can do this we can solve the riddle of the double slit experiment, what happens when we observe light going through the slits?

Most often what must be considered is right in front of us, they say apples fell in front of Newton, and to millions of other people throughout the millennia, fruits fell from tress all over the world. The information package that was Newton was inclined to understand the principle of why the apples fell from the tree, the relationship between the apples, the apple tree and the earth, all experiments are about understanding relationships. Is understanding light simply a matter of observation what is all around us, light? First, we need to remember how we see that apple fall from the tree, or how do we see how anything falls?

It is a well-known fact that if one was to knock over a box of cigarettes over the side of a table it will fall to the ground, this phenomenon of gravity is verified by nature everyday, every minute, you don’t need a laboratory to prove the existence of gravity, or if a rose will smell the same by any other name, we can see the box of cigarettes fall down to the ground thanks to photons. We can see the beer can that remained on the table thanks to photons, like we can see everything else. We identify common objects like a stool in the way usually thanks to our interactions with photons. We can see that can of beer on the table because it is reflecting light and our photon sensors, our eyes pick up these photons. The photons enter the eye with a certain pattern, interacting with different sensors in the eye, the patterns of the photons are turned into electrical patterns that the brain understands. These patterns allow the brain to differentiate things, direct the hand to hold the can of beer that has mass. Everything we can see will reflect light differently because of locality. Two seemingly identical cans can never reflect photons in the same way because of different locations, hence the brain can differentiate between the two localities, the brain directs the hand not to the empty can but to the full can.

In the illustration above, photon energy affected the electrical circuitry of the brain, this electrical energy was converted into mechanical energy to grab hold of the full can of beer and direct it to the mouth. Light allows us to observe our surroundings. It is photons interacting with our photon sensors that allow us to peer through a telescope, this interaction between photons and our photon sensors, our eyes allow us to see our reflection in the mirror.

This is all readily acceptable, but how does it allow us to explain the Thomas Young experiment, especially what happens when we observe light as it passes through the slits? To observe light one needs sensors, humans have eyes, there is an interaction of electricity and photons and that is how we see. This is but one characteristic of light. But for this to be meaningful we must look at the photon, we must look at light.

Capturing the Photon on April 11, 2013 the 1MIT Technology Review had an article entitled “First Demonstration of the Storage and Release of light in metamaterial.” The capturing sub heading reads “Nobody has been able to trap electro magnetic waves inside a metamaterial and then release them again. Until now.” This is a technological leap through, humans have made light be still like a cigarette lighter on the table. When something is still we can look at it, the lighter on he table, because it is still, we can look at it, see its colour, its size, it’s markings. Now that we can make light still to know it will be to look at it, just as we look at a lighter on the table, imagine the difficulty of observing anything to it true depths if it was always on the move. The fact that Toshihiro Nakanishi and colleagues Takehiro Otani, Yasuhiro Tamayama and Masao Kitano where able to capture photons in such a medium means sooner than we think we will look at light, but we already know what to expect because of past experiments.

As recently as 2015 2Nature Photonics published an article “Extraction of a single photon from an optical pulse”, soon single photons will be captured and studied. It is not at all far fetched to have a thought of looking at the photon.

What would happen if we could look at a photon, we would see the photon. We know from previous experiments that in normal circumstances there is no photon been reflected but we will be able to observe the photon, for us to observe the photon it means that the photon is somehow radiating itself, we shall call this process of self radiating ziyenza, a rose by any other name.

This process of ziyenza should not seem far fetched at all if we are up to date with current events in the experimentation process taking place around the world. For example, we know in normal circumstances there is no photon to photon interaction, but in intense artificially created fields there is photon to photon interaction, and other interesting facts about light and its relationships with its surroundings. In colliders, photons smash into each other, a by product of the collider process, it’s an unintended consequence but a consequence none the less.

On a 3CERN blog, there is an article written in 2014 by Achintya Rao entitled “The LHC as a photon collider,” photons apparently smash into each other producing other particles. Reading the article there are some comments of interest for instance, “As they fly through the LHC, the accelerating protons radiate photons, the quanta of light. If two protons going in opposite directions fly very close to one another within CMS, photons radiated from each can collide together and produce new particles, just as in proton collisions. The two parent protons remain completely intact but recoil as a result of this photon-photon interaction: they get slightly deflected from their original paths but continue circulating in the LHC. We can determine whether the photon interactions took place by identifying these deflected protons, thus effectively treating the LHC as a photon collider and adding a new probe to our toolkit for exploring fundamental physics.”

Observing a Photon:   What is of interest to us are the comments protons radiating photons, the larger quotation is for people to accept that under artificial conditions there can be photon to photon interaction. When protons radiate photons, this is not the same as an atom radiating photons because of changes in its energy composition, this is a proton radiating photons under these artificial conditions, by the end of this discussion, many might very well doubt that it is the proton radiating the photon, but that is not the focus of this discussion. But what we know from experiments is that under intense artificial fields the photon radiates a proton, this means there is an imbalance within the proton and a photon is released. By the end of this discussion we should be able to ask, is it the proton radiating the photon or is it possible other relationships are taking place within the proton because of the intense fields.  

Looking at a photon to see that photon means it must radiate energy, in this case itself, it ziyenza’s itself. This is illustrated in figure 1 below.

For us to observe a photon this is only possible if it radiates itself, for us humans, not yet talking about machines and electronic sensors, just our eyes. Hypothetical but allows us to understand a photon. For us to see the photon it must go through the process of ziyenza. This means that a photon can be in two states, when it is freer or under conditions where it is compelled to go through the process of ziyenza, observing the particle creates the conditions for ziyenza. For us to recognize that the photon is there it must register with our brain by registering with our sensors, our eyes, that turn the photon information into electronic information so that we understand, we never actually ever see the photon, but a product of ziyenza and that is only because we have electronic sensors that can translate photons into electronic images.

When we look away from the photon there is no other sensor in our body that can be able to sense the photon, the relationship with the photon that is stationary and being observed is with the eyes, with the sensors, these sensors detect the photon causing it to be in a condition of ziyenza where it is capable of been in a relationship, to observe the photon, the newly created photons are energy that the eye senses, there is a relationship and an energy cycle is involved. There must be an energy cycle involved because it takes energy to register that there is a photon there.

Figure 2 is showing two observers of the same photon. Note that the photon is already in a state of ziyenza, its behaviour will not change it will interact with the second observer as with the first.

N observers should yield the same behaviour as illustrated in figure 3.

Having seen the behaviour of a photon in relation to our electronic electromagnetic sensors, our eyes, we can add another thought, returning to figure 1 with one observer, what happens when there is another observer observing the photons going to A1. Let us freeze frame everything and introduce observer a second observer A2. For A2 the observed photon is different than A1, this is illustrated in figure 4, and this illustration will be important when thinking about experimentation given the availability of instrumentation, but the strength of dealing with light is there will always come a time when it is possible to carry out it is not like theories that deal with big bang, scientific evidence for and against a big bang, holograph theory, the principle of ziyenza because of the nature of the study of optics will be tested sooner or later. Hopefully one is understanding the electromagnetic field relationship between the eyes and the photons.

Unfreezing the scenario in figure we will realize the photons will be moving at extreme high speeds, A2 registering any of the photons means that the process of ziyenza is still taking place at very high speeds.

Understanding the Double Slit Experiment:   A photon stream will make two patterns, it will either behave as particles, or as a wave. This is an accepted fact, but for clarity it will be important to cover the principles behind the bizarre behaviour of the photon stream. It really is seemingly bizarre and a host of new age principles are based on the reality that the Thomas Young experiment seemingly is unexplainable and there must be something special about human beings to affect the behaviour of a particle by thought alone, affecting matter just as the gods had desired for us. Even some physicists are taking the idea seriously about how powerful the human mind is and are designing experiments towards proving this end.

On May 23, 2017, the online scientific magazine 4Futurism had the headlines “Scientists Have an Experiment to See If the Human Mind Is Bound to the Physical World.” Scientists from the well funded Perimeter Institute in Ontario, Canada, want to test the idea that the human mind is a unique creation able to create matter. This discussion obviously tends towards these are natural phenomenon and the human being does not function outside the laws of nature. Just because we are human does not negate the relationship between electro magnetism and photons. Eyes are photon sensors, just far more sophisticated than say gamma meters or heat sensors, heat is because of photon actions. If heat sensors where as sophisticated as the eye we would see in detail a human face translated into heat patterns, every crack on the face, scar on the ear.

5Lucien Hardy the author of the paper “Proposal to use Humans to switch settings in a Bell experiment” that was the idea behind the article in Futurism, has an interesting quote about what they are attempting to achieve. The quote is as follows, “We suppose some sort of mindmatter duality in which the physical universe is local and super-deterministic. In the absence of minds, then, it is possible to violate Bell inequalities. Now we suppose that minds act on the physical universe locally introducing “new information” into the physical universe through the brain.” He has an experiment in mind and, as has been explained, most concepts in quantum mechanics can eventually be tested then supported or discarded. This is a fundamental advantage of dealing with basic information, logic builds a model, following on previously successful experiments. Hopefully the experiments provided in this discussion will be meaningful in helping us understand light at its most basic, what happens when we look at light, and what are the implications?

Figure 5 below shows a common illustration, the wave pattern of the Thomas Young experiment.

Figure 6 again shows a common illustration, what happens when we observe the process of photon stream going through he double slits, the photon stream instead of behaving like a wave, behaves like particles.

As curios human beings we want to know why this change in the pattern, why is light behaving differently. Accepting the logic that has been laid out in this discussion, we understand that there are two opposite states a photon can be in, this does not in any way argue against the photon having other properties like polarity, another property is it can be in a state of ziyenza, or not. In a state of ziyenza the photon is replicating itself, this means extra energy is being used and it enters a state of lower energy. In this lower energy state, it behaves as what has been called like a particle. When it is not in a state of ziyenza, the particle stream is freer, it is not in a relationship that causes the state of ziyenza. The state of ziyenza is caused seemingly by observation, observation to be registered implies electromagnetic wave field, relationships, within the electromagnetic field and this will be firmly understood in the next two paragraphs.

Figure 7 below shows what is happening when we observe looking to peek into which slit does the particle choose when we observe, the particle stream behaves like particles. Figure 7 is showing what is happening.

In figure 7 we see that we have a sensor that is trying to peek into the secret of what slit does the particle choose. For the sensor to detect the presence of the photon it can only do this through the electromagnetic field, the sensor is electric, there is no other way for us to do this. The sensor and photon interact in the electromagnetic wave, there is no where else for them to interact, and that causes the photon to be in a state of ziyenza, because to measure the photon, it must give of some energy in the electromagnetic field. The energy the photon gives off however is not enough for it not to reach the destination, it just reaches that distance behaving differently, the relationship has changed the destination of the photon.

The highly sensitive sensors replace our eyes to cause the state of ziyenza in figure 7. This should squash the idea that somehow humans are the cause. True by observing humans are the cause of light to behave like a particle instead of a wave, but this is merely because of interactions within the electromagnetic wave, if a dog could observe as keenly as a human it would have the same effect.

Understanding this, it would best be to at this moment discuss the experiment that was laid out by Lucien Hardy where he wants to show that human beings can be used for the entanglement experiment, he should also test chimpanzees, they also switch buttons on and off, it is just the electromagnetic field.

First Experiment:       The first experiment proposed is a simple extrapolation of the original “let’s observe what is happening,” experiment. It is merely adding a second observer to figure 7. This second observer observes the first observer. What is being investigated is the behaviour of the photon stream, the photons. Will we get the effect as laid out in figure 4, this will be a conclusive proof of ziyenza. By merely placing a second observer the dynamics of the experiment change. We have two relationships in the experiment. The first relationship is the original observation, the second relationship is observing the original observation.

What we want from sensor 2, is to merely register increased photon activity and we know that the process of ziyenza is a reality. We can see this set up in in figure 8.

The success of this experiment merely depends sensor 2, S2, detecting increased photon activity going to sensor 1, S1.

Experiment 2: A simple experiment, depending on truth of recent scientific breakthroughs, is simply to observe photon that has been stored thanks to development in technology. For this we modify figure 1 to get figure 9.

Having a stored photon, can a photon sensor sense it, if it can that means the process of ziyenza is taking place. When we read papers about storing a photon/ s, we realize for example that they are in some storage material like metamaterial. The photon must be still and material must not be able to greatly affect by the electromagnetic field and thus not shield the photon/ s from outside interference. If the sensor in figure 9 can sense the photon, that means the photon is somehow radiating itself.

Implications:   Does material radiate photons or do photons radiate themselves given what is now considered peculiar conditions. For example, in the colliders, is it protons radiating photons or are photons radiating themselves from within the proton given the intense electromagnetic fields inside colliders, thus forcing protons to be in a state of ziyenza.

If these experiments prove successful, where does the photon get its energy from to undertake this process of ziyenza, ziyenza is strictly a process of something radiating itself, or self replicating, but it needs energy to do this. The most likely place thanks to previous studies is that this energy comes from dark matter and dark energy. Therefore, further studies in optics should yield results in the near future concerning the nature of dark energy.

Can we replicate this in a large enough scale, if yes then we have possibilities of having solar power even in the dark.

Where is the photon?  Understanding that when we observe the double slit experiment we get particle behaviour, due to influences in the electro magnetic field, we can convincingly say if Ziyenza proves to be true, we know where the photon is, some of the randomness taken out, we only know where it is because these are controlled experiments. Figure 9 shows the effects of ziyenza, wave behaviour and particle behaviour over one another.

Figure 9 argues that we can know where the particle is if we know enough information about that photon, what other information is affecting the information package that is the photon. We can see the if we correspond numerically the numerical values of y and r as same particle given a condition of being observed or not being observed. With more information understanding what is happening we become more certain in understanding where the particle ought to be, we understand that there is a transformation process caused by the process of ziyenza, this is due to the different relationships the photon has with its surroundings in terms of energy, when a photon is observed, it goes to a different energy state compared to when it is not being observed.

Figure 9.1 and 9.2 are merely a visual separation of what is going on in figure 9.

Conclusions:   It is hoped that this paper will introduce other ideas about what is considered “bizarre” behaviour, perhaps it is not the human, just a phenomenon of nature that we have not yet fully realized. These thoughts and corresponding experiments will allow us to postpone the boogeyman for now. Where does light get its energy from? Which particles in the wave spectrum have more energy, for example which particle has more energy given location on wave, y1/ r1 or y13 /r13, how does this affect their 6quantum tunnelling behaviour? These are fundamental questions that will eventually determine the material well being of humanity, boogeyman thoughts will be a hindrance and must be refuted as soon as possible. Those endowed with the resources will eventually have to verify this theory or accept the boogeyman


[1] MIT Technology Review, MIT, 30 May 2017
[2] Rosenblum S, Bechler O, Shomroni I, Lovsky Y, Guendelman G, Dayan B. Extraction of a single photon from an optical pulse 30 May 2017
[3] Rao A. The LHC as a photon collider, CERN Blog 30 May 2017
[4] Scientists Have an Experiment to See If the Human Mind Is Bound to the Physical World, Futurism, 30 May 2017
[5] Hardy L. Proposal to use Humans to switch settings in a Bell experiment, Cornell University Library 30 May 2017
[6] Khumalo B, Quantum Phone, Entanglement, and Information, Institute of Knowledge 30 May 2017

Monday, August 14, 2017

Am I a Racist

It is a beautiful world, especially if one gets to enjoy themselves here and there. A mind is a tool that one can use for whatever reason they decide to use it for. The idea of some in this world is to say only their minds are capable of doing such wonderful feats as thinking, when we see lions thinking, when we see crocodiles thinking, but they want to deny other humans the ability to think, a futile struggle, but they try, because surely if a deer can think, a human being must be able to think.

Well leave other humans alone, why bother people, decided I will look at knowledge and its relationship with the economy. The first thing one realized was the literature at the time was false, white economists, we must mention their race or the question Am I a racist can not be answered, these white economists had been saying and still insist knowledge is a recent commodity introduced by the rise of the computer. Like it or not the mind has always been the primary tool of man’s survival, the word mind alone implies knowledge, how can anything else be, to know how to get food is knowledge, yet a white will deny this obvious fact and insist knowledge age started with the computer.

What is behind such thinking to deny the obvious, that it is sheer nonsense to claim knowledge age started with computers when the most ancient of humans needed to be know how to get food. Realizing you can never win an argument that has based knowledge on race, I mean Wikipedia became involved in the lies, surely a nigger, ah, to say one is thinking of a man would be wrong, because a man can think, but a nigger can’t a nigger is only worthy as a slave, none thinking. Wikipedia, an institute supposedly claiming to be an institute of knowledge, who on their countless links have examples of humanity using knowledge throughout history would contradict all that evidence they possess to say a nigger can’t think. Because if they considered me a man, a man can think, to them not even a black man, but a nigger, and they kept saying Bhekuzulu Khumalo is wrong, what was it, speedy deletion, something like that, okay fine, it’s okay, knowledge age started with computer age, before that man was surviving on instinct, if that’s what you want a nigger to say to be considered a man, fine, knowledge started in computer age and before humanity survived on instinct like an amoebae, hopefully man enough, accepting the reality that only a white man can think, that is the logic we end up with.

Why would people deny such an obvious fact like it is wrong in every sense of the word wrong to even consider that the knowledge age started with computers, and accept the reality that knowledge has always been the primary weapon of humans, of mammals, they must all know how to get food, let’s take mammals out as these high and mighty are above all, second only to the mythical creations, imagine creating the whole universe and then coming down to earth and bestowing whites only with the ability to think. Obviously, every white believes these creation myths that they alone are bestowed with a mind, a brain that is functional and everything else is below it and can be exploited and ruined.

Why would one say every white believes these myths, millions claim to be atheists, true they might claim to be atheists, but their actions according to their science says only they can think, therefore the religious white and the atheist whites are both racist when it comes to the black man. Those who claim to have scientific minds decided to say for racial reasons that the computer ushered in the knowledge era. For racial reasons, they exposed how far willing they are to go for phoney scientific evidence, the evidence is on Wikipedia for those interested.  This means whites are willing to go to any extent to say fuck you nigger, imagine a computer built by knowledge, then they get first premise wrong and say it is the other way round.

Google behaved in exactly the same manner as Wikipedia, but they will tell you they are for some higher ideals blah blah blah, but when it comes to a black, all their hatred is spewed upon, for no reason that a black can’t think, that fact must be fought with trillions of dollars of resources, what the hell, nobody knew it was a battle, these odds are worse than 300 hundred man fighting thousands upon thousands and coming out alive at the end of the battle. Showed you google long time ago, their evil only relevant when it attacks white women, when it says they are bimbos.

This argument that a black cannot think from both sides the religious whites and the atheist white that a black cannot think is used to justify their arguments whenever harm happens to a black, anyway its only a back, they can’t think, it’s not as if we have killed a future rocket scientist. And everywhere they promote nonsense showing a black to be a vile and violent creature with no beauty in culture, at the same time saying I am stupid, no, how on earth can I love that.

People are different, but those with Zulu blood, not corrupted by propaganda immediately realize, are these people crazy, lies likes this, what does it mean, this is immense danger, what is the white man hiding, when you tell open lies like this and have them published in leading journals belonging to Harvard, Cambridge, Yale, Princeton, Oxford, and all the other nonsense, what is the game plan? Why is it blacks that espouse this nonsense are known as progressives, how are they promoting progress when they yap their mouths without a thought, never asking is this true.

The idea of course is to say a black man who regurgitates anything a white man espouses as a thinker, so I am presented a Neil DeGraase Tyson as an example of a great great black mind. What has this man done we ask in excitement and anticipation, nothing he married a white woman, what game is the white man playing the Zulu must question, but the same white men will say a computer was the birth of the knowledge age, a computer created by knowledge.

Then a white people will say I am a racist when I warn others defend yourself they are coming, prepare your self, they are coming with illusions and will mock your death, mindless like chimpanzees will be their excuse when they kill. What other reason could there ultimately be.

It’s like somebody saying they believe in trade and then justify colonialism. Well all that gold and minerals you stole you could have traded for them, spears where made of iron, you want the iron we would have sold it to you, the same thinking continues. This desire to always lie about black people. What kind of nonsensical scientist would even dare accept a computer created by knowledge brought the knowledge age when the idea is easily rubbished, a scientist who is very conscious about race.

Well if saying it as it is as racism good, whites are racists saying it as it is not, they both can’t be racism, denying peoples minds is racism because it is saying it as it is not, all evils are built on lies. Whites like turning things around kick you, and when you defend yourself scream you just like us see, it takes two hands to clap, funny people. When they kill other peoples children its funny, when somebody calls for killing of their children they get upset, but they actually have done the deed. 

This is the same attitude whites have taken throughout history, they kill lessor humans and when so called lessor humans point out we love our people too and must defend ourselves whites get all upset, no, black people are important just as much as they are. Kill 100 natives its okay, kill 50 slaves its okay, they kill one back, a small token of resistance and whites say look, these people are evil, no, white opinion is irrelevant, it can deny facts like a computer created by knowledge can not be the dawn of the knowledge age, so they are happily kill 100 slaves, 100 natives and then when one white dies, natives are evil, no, if whites refuse liberty for all, people better defend themselves, in every society the right to bare arms should be there, if the state kills you no matter the excuse, fight it back and kill its agents, if police men, tools of the state are targeting a certain population, they must have the rights to defend themselves from the state, it doesn't matter if they be called savages, evil is wiping you out.

So they sponsor all types of dictators in Africa, whose only job is not to give Africans liberty but to make deals with white business, after all for anybody to be loved by whites they must tell the truth that all knowledge comes from a white, the Africans can be oppressed for their own good and London, Paris and Washington can reap enormous profits, because a black life is worth nothing. A good black is the one who adheres to colonial policy that all blacks are the same. But it is the whites that said they created these countries artificially in such manners so that they could divide and rule the people, the good African is the one who supports keeping these colonial structures so that ironically people can continue to be divided and ruled. All this pulled off by pouring money into the ideology a black can't have original thought, he is but a poodle to be taught, sit, stand, follow, fetch, repeat.

Taking knowledge as it is obviously shows a lot more than most economists would ever see, because knowledge is information we know and information is everything.

I will continue to show the benefits of liberty, free markets, free people for as long as I can with the best my mind has to offer, but in case liberty is rejected people must be ready to defend themselves, and when attacked continuously the concept of the natural right to life must kick in, who is killing who, kill them back wherever possible, you must survive, rejection of liberty is rejection of fairness and justice, those denying liberty have one wish enslavement, if they openly kill you it is to instill fear, fight back, is that being a racist, wow.

Look at my posts, they started changing realizing only going to get fooled, you like algorithms, and correlation, check my posts. I love liberty, I love being free, wiping out my race is wiping me out, it is as simple as that, but otherwise, prefer to be free, we don't want no bossy races, no bossy religions, all these bossy bossy people who do it for only one reason, to control all the money, all the resources. Just a guy traveling through the universe others say they don't want bossy sexes, I don't know, how can a man be bossy when he is protecting his genes, everybody tow the line, but they say bossy sexes. We certainly don't want bossy Presidents and dictators, and kings, want to be a king, go far away in background like Japanese emperor, we give you free booze and meat, otherwise go away. We don't want bossy cops, and any other bossy fellow unless he is paying us, imagine a bossy cop or bossy king, or bossy dictator, or bossy whatever, we are bloody paying you, have some respect, get out of our way. 

Well I believe I have shown in a most methodological way the benefits of understanding knowledge as has been the primary resource of humans. You get to see and understand that nobody knows what the future holds, it really is all just a random even, no matter how close to certainty an event is, it can never be 100% guaranteed, even dropping an egg, it is not 100% guaranteed that it will break even if you throw that egg against a wall and it breaks a trillion times, driving the other day I made a sharp break and a case of eggs fell, not one egg broke, to my shock. Because we don't know where the next great piece of knowledge is coming from, liberty is the most just system, liberty, free trade, free speech, free thoughts, without destroying the society, the natural condition of information is to survive. The aim of an electron is to at least keep its present form, to not be destroyed, it's all information, electron is information, we are information, the law must not privilege anybody too much, race, sex, religion, ethnicity, president, king, soldier, no, nobody. When scientists start privileging each other on other factors besides facts, well, are they scientists or race fighters. 

Bhekuzulu Khumalo

Monday, March 6, 2017

The Scope of Gravitational Waves

From wikicommons
Nasa 2005

On February 11, 2016, LIGO, the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory, announced in a press release that for the first-time human beings have detected gravitational waves through the process of experimentation. This is rightly taken as a major achievement, according to “formal” scientific theory that humans have detected gravity waves it means gravity officially exist. This negates the fact that calculations that can only work with the inclusion of gravity have been around since the time of Galileo, and probably before if we search and reason with nothing but a scientific mind that wants to know, if interested in English grammar, one can read Shakespear, if interested in racism, read Hitler, lots of others, you are for the battlefield,  people calling themselves scientists yet carrying out racial experiments to prove their race, this is for those interested in gravity strictly, those who want to discuss the nature of gravity given this monumental experiment that took place just over a year ago. . 

Is Gravity a Particle?

The next question that is being asked by the scientific community is, is gravity a particle? This is the next logical question, and has already been answered. Everything is information, everything is discrete, it can be isolated by its unique characteristics, a lion, a star, an electron, a photon, a human, all information is discrete and everything is information. Gravity is a particle, it exists it must be discrete if all information can be used to compute. But of course, there are always those who don’t believe everything is information, maybe some sort of spook exists out there. Is gravity the spook?

LIGO Experiment

The diagram below has the LIGO experiment that detected gravity for the first time in human history. If one is truly interested in gravity, they would be already familiar with this experiment, so will not go into too much detail, videos can always explain the experiment, we must not get caught up, what is important is not the experiment, it’s been done, it was a great success, it is not up for debate, what we want to answer is gravity a particle. Well first we must understand the nature of gravity, the chance the experiment has to offer, the data.

The idea behind the experiment we shoot a light into a mirror in A, the light splits and travels to mirrors in B and C that are set precisely 4 kilometers apart. This is a wonderful experiment in its simplicity, behind a complex theory. When the light returns from B and C back towards A, if there is no disturbance then the light should cancel out, however if there is a disturbance, then the lights do not cancel out, one will arrive before the other, either from C or B, it does not matter, that disturbance is due to gravity, gravity waves.

The experiment worked, there are lots of videos explaining it, the question of this essay is to ask, is gravity discrete or not, what does, what can this experiment tell us?

How Does it Work?

This idea comes from Einstein, Einstein was answering the question, what is time? What are the things that affect time? There is only one thing that affects time, and the answer is known to the San people once ridiculed as Bushmen, the answer is simply a question of distance. How long does it take to get there, it is a half days walk, a morning walk, a full day’s walk, that is all time is, that is why it is relative? The beauty of Einstein is he did not ask what affects gravity, he asked what makes time relative an easier question to answer, and gravity has a huge part in explaining time, and the whole experiment is around the question of time.
The two mirrors at B and C are synchronized in a such a manner that if there is no disturbance, the light returning cancels each other out. To the best of our knowledge they are 4 kilometres from mirror in A. The only disturbance that can affect this is a change is distance, the only thing that can change distance, thereby affecting time, is the pulling and contracting effect of a gravity wave. The pulling and contracting effect of gravity means if gravity waves a passing through, the laser beams inside the vacuum tunnels in B, and C can only not meet if the distances have changed, the distances can only be changed by gravity, though travelling at the same speed in both directions, light find's that the distance has changed.


We understand that the distance has been affected due to the gravity waves. Gravity waves affect matter in that at one end nature is stretched and other end nature seems compressed. This stretching and compressing effects distance as we understand it in a three-dimensional existence. As distance is affected one beam of light will take slightly longer to complete that 4-kilometer journey, this means the two beams will not cancel each other out even though conditions of the experiment have been calibrated to cancel each other out, this proves the existence of gravity and just to make sure LIGO has two stations 1000’s of kilometers apart just to make sure local events are not affecting the experiment.

The mere fact that the experiment needed arms 4 kilometers long shows the lack of precision of our current instruments. It is what we are using to calibrate that is causing this lack of precision such that just to detect a tiny movement we need to construct experiments of such magnitude, no error possible. What do we know about information, we know it is everything, everything is information, all made up of the same things. All information is discrete meaning it can be isolated, that is how we learn. Gravity is a discrete concept, we can isolate it in equations, if it could not be isolated we could never know what gravity is, people saw apples falling from a tree it is said and they said gravity. If nothing was discrete we would not be able to know the difference between 1 + 2 = 3, and 3 + 1 = 4, it would be meaningless. If nothing was discrete 3 + 7 = 10 might as well be e = mc2 we would not be able to differentiate.

As all information is discrete and can be isolated, all information can be used for computing. Pastoralists learn counting by counting their cows, each cow being a digit, a cow is just information organized in such a manner that we call it a cow. To others the digit is quantum, sub atomic particles.
Are the subatomic particles we are using too big, too heavy for further calibration, meaning we need to go finer with what we are using for measuring, maybe one day gravitons will be used to compute, so small, making precision in our instruments even more precise. You can use stars as your abacus if you like, all information can be isolated and used to compute. But stars are impractical, they are too big, the computer would cover the galaxy.

What is the Nature of Gravity Waves, Are they Particles?

At the end of the day there are those in the old-fashioned mode asking wow, we have proved the existence of gravity waves, now, are they particles. There is no formal proof to the answer, but there was no formal proof of gravity waves until February 2016, but gravity has been included in equations for a very long time. We know everything is discrete and why should gravity escape this? If everything is discrete, it means gravity waves are particles.

With the fortune of hindsight behind us we can ask many questions around the experiment. This is only because people are already eager to start the long journey of holding a gravity particle in the laboratory and say here it is. So when the returning lights do not cancel each other out, light will pass through and hit another mirror, one count. Absolute precision that a light beam can cancel another, but each time they did not cancel each other what was intensity of light hitting the mirror, was it always the same, what differences were there? Was it the same for light returning from B as well as C. We need data before even getting started on proving discreteness by the method of what people need as proof, literally seeing the gravity particle. From that experiment alone they could have set it up with desire to collect data from their great experiment.

Light intensity tells us the nature of the wave, it gives us its frequency just for starters. We can have a regular monotonous pattern. Little data but the beginnings of fully comprehending what these gravity waves are, we are looking at their behavior. That’s what those social scientists who want to control do, look at the behavior of the people, the domestic branch of intelligence, institutions like the FBI, we must collect data, even the simplest of data is data, it’s something.

There could very well be patterns within patterns, merely having a different intensity between light returning from B than that of C is very big news indeed, the nature of the wave is not uniform, behaviour is vastly difference, any difference is enough, it is enough to differentiate, to isolate further, sure it is gravity, but there is differentiation.

Why is this concept of differentiation important even though we know it is all just gravity? We know from quantum tunnelling that though all particles may seem similar with our imprecise calibration, experiment shows differentiation, similar sub-atomic particles per our instrumentation however when given a barrier, some will go through, some will not go through. Different intensity of the light returning depending on origin of destination, be it B, or C, then we have different characteristics within gravity.

There is much more, what if we get a repeating pattern from both sources of returning light There is just so much to learn by merely collecting the simplest data without any physical changes to the experiment, just as the experiment was. Though simple data, the requirements in the precision needed will be to the best in what humans can achieve right now.

Whilst collecting data, they could have, now one must remember this is all in hindsight, but, the could have surrounded B and C with different materials, They could have surrounded them with 2 meter thick concrete, does the pattern in the light intensity change, let’s not be argumentative, let us think, we know that we are thinking of the intensity of the light that passes when the synchronization is broken, intensity does not only include brightness, brightness will not be a factor here, the intensity we are looking at is how long is the light beam, how many nano seconds does the light hit the mirror each time.

What happens when we put an electric field around B and C, what effect does it have on the gravity wave. What if only B has a 2-meter concrete barrier or an electric field, what is the difference in the intensity of the light compared to other experiments. All relatively simple data, but it is needed if we are to look at gravity waves with greater intensity.

Collect the data from the experiment and you will get your experimentation proof that gravity is a particle. Let’s see how this thing behaves.

The Missing Data [added *th March 2017 2 days after original]

One would have thought that the missing data is apparent from reading the above. However, realizing the socio battles, perhaps one should explain further he missing data, vital collection method to allow us suck as much information this phenomenon verified by LIGO, a great feat indeed, it keeps everybody grounded, steps at a time.

The evidence is right in front of us, but it is missed because we where not looking for it. Simplicity is key. Let us look at the light, and only the behavior of the light, in every detail we can from this simple but technologically challenging experiment. How does gravity affect the light, from there we have data, what affects the light, gravity and nothing else we know or can think of.

What is this data that is missing, is it even relevant? Our questions dwell around time, not any other concept of intensity. Time cancels out other forms of intensity, like brightness, amount of energy, how relevant are they today, especially when it comes to gravity and the time period, because a wave loses energy, does it not remain a wave and keep some form of its original pattern, time allows such factors to be included, time simplifies things, though energy is extremely important but as we shall understand time can categorize in a way energy can not. Time can categorize a sick twin as still being in the same category as the other twin in most things besides energy. Time is a dimension that affects all dimensions, it will have more neutrality as a control.

Let’s use time, each moment the precision was lost, synchronization was lost, and effects of gravity waves was registered, how many seconds did this last. We can easily know how many seconds this lasted by timing it. The diagram below shows the data collected when considering such variables, the pattern is just that, artistic, however there is a serious scientific principle to be answered, except the data was seen as not important, therefore no steps where taken to collect this data. What remains a fact is we will collect such data. Adding a timer is one more little step in precision in so precise an experiment.

Note from the diagram above the simplicity. It is just a tally, from a tally we can importantly build a probability function, we are looking at discreetness, how do we know, if a reasonable pattern can be picked out from the data, we have a probability function, we have discreetness. We have a start, if there is a pattern, predictable, we have discreteness, gravity passes a major test of is it information, same like all other information.

The illustration above we can extract more information, by looking at which arm the data came from, this is illustrated in the diagrams below.

Was this further explanation necessary for people talking about gravity, mysteries of information? The most important factor to keep in mind is we are merely looking at time, no preconceived ideas of energy like brightness, This is the most raw of information, how long did it appear for, how bright was it is great, lots of different kinds of energy that will be inherent with gravity and not light. It appeared for 3 units of time, sometimes bright sometimes not so bright, like a ghost over here and over there, always the same one. The laser beams are central to this experiment, why not extract everything from them?

By everything we mean everything, if confident in our technology let us observe the beam of light, does the beam of light, send a pulse as a test, does the beam of light hit the mirrors at B and C at the same time, if yes, what causes spookiness of synchronization being lost. Just as important when we observe if light hits the mirrors at B and C at the same time, how is the pattern illustrated in figures above change, these are interesting questions for quantum mechanics. It is not an insult to point out that this data is very much needed. 

Bhekuzulu Khumalo



Blog Archive

Bhekuzulu Khumalo

I write about knowledge economics, information, liberty, and freedom